Post Reply 
What is the Correct Test Method for Case Hardened Steel
01-18-2007, 11:33 AM (This post was last modified: 01-18-2007 03:56 PM by Gordon.)
Post: #1
What is the Correct Test Method for Case Hardened Steel
We manufacture rollers from AISA6820 steel with a hardness of 28HRC.

These are machined then further hardened by nitriding to a desired 56 HRC.

The depth of Nitrided material is about 0.4mm.

When we test the rolls with our Rockwell machine (Using B and C) we are only obtaining a hardness of 28 i.e. the core material.

Our supplier tells us that the depth of hard material at 0.4mm is too thin and that they test with a "non invasive" method obtaining the correct 56.

I have my doubts as some of the rolls are breaking up on the surface.

Is Rockwell C a suitable method for testing a 0.4mm case hardened surface?

Thanks in advance.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
01-18-2007, 03:55 PM
Post: #2
RE: What is the Correct Test Method for Case Hardened Steel
Hi dunlaw

Sign0016 to the Surface Engineering Forum.

Rockwell C can not be used to give a true value of surface hardness for a nitrided case of 0.4 mm (0.016") effective or total depth as your supplier has indicated. Rockwell B should not be used for the same reason, but also this scale is not suitable at this hardness level. Rockwell C method would need a minimum effective case depth of around 0.75 mm to give true surface hardness values. See link Test Piece Minimum Thickness for Rockwell Hardness Test which should also give a rough guide for coating and case hardened thickness. If you want to use a Rockwell hardness test method, you are really limited to using the Rockwell Superficial scales HR-15-N and at a pinch HR-30-N.

To be honest, if your supplier is telling you only, that the nitrided case is 0.4 mm thick and 56 HRC (so-called equivalent of a "non invasive" test), I think is poor practice. This situation tends to reinforce my arguments from previous message threads (most recent link). If converted or equivalent hardness values are to be quoted (particularly where the parts can not be tested with the quoted method), they should be backed up with data from the original tests. 56 HRC equivalent seems to be a low surface hardness for a nitrided case or is this in fact the hardness value used to determine the effective case depth? (Example: 56 HRC equivalent at 0.4mm depth).

The best method is to use a Vickers or Knoop hardness traverse on the cross-section through the nitrided case into the core. This will give you a hardness/depth profile. Plotting a graph hardness verses depth, you can determine the effective case depth at a specified hardness (possibly say 620 HV (~ 56 HRC equiv) at 0.4 mm depth) and the total case depth where hardness levels off to that of the core.

[Image: hvtrav.gif]

Hope that helps.

Regards Gordon
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




Possibly Related Threads...
Thread: Author Replies: Views: Last Post
  twin wire arc spraying equipment for stainless steel wire, monel wire, etc. technovel 6 868 08-01-2008 10:59 AM
Last Post: adam wintle
  Coatings on stainless steel 304 mamatha_0823 3 453 07-24-2008 10:01 PM
Last Post: tonysemple
  Anti-corrosion coating for 409 Stainless Steel GlenB 5 813 07-24-2008 09:57 PM
Last Post: tonysemple
  Stellite Powder test guru2707 0 351 06-22-2008 06:02 AM
Last Post: guru2707
  Stellite Hardfacing test guru2707 3 464 06-01-2008 10:07 PM
Last Post: hvofhamid
  Steel-Rubber friction droletk 3 1,221 05-26-2008 03:22 PM
Last Post: Gordon
  Have trouble with bend test William 7 964 11-22-2007 04:07 PM
Last Post: Gordon
  Stainless Steel Coating Bagri 5 1,259 09-21-2007 09:37 AM
Last Post: Gordon
  hard chrome method mechanic42 2 1,426 03-23-2007 06:53 AM
Last Post: mechanic42
  Test for nitrided case sandero 5 1,810 03-08-2007 03:08 PM
Last Post: Gordon

Forum Jump:





Subscribe in a reader