|
Copper Contact to Gold Surface Design Question
|
|
04-18-2008, 04:40 PM
(This post was last modified: 04-18-2008 04:43 PM by gpalermo.)
Post: #1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Copper Contact to Gold Surface Design Question
Hi,
I'm designing a "burn-in" station for a unique laser diode chip-on-carrier utilizing a 59 gold,99.99% electrical-grade), platinum, and tungsten contact pad for electrical conduction. The system is going to utilize soft, beryllium-copper 97.9% Cu - 2.1% Be leaf spring contacts to transmit the power upon contact. This is the full setup of one rack with several carriers: ![]() The full view is not really detailed enough, so here is a zoomed view showing the actual contact pads and spring on in place: ![]() And just to get real detailed, I made a profile sketch showing the leaf spring contact unstressed in a bounding box. Please disregard the corner of the blade that is intersecting at the bottom right as that is being issued: ![]() Soooo... From this small background (which I hope is sufficient), I just wanted to know the following: 1) Is there a threshold force I can design the spring to exert upon the surface of the metalized contact pads to minimize, and if possible, eliminate surface defects? 2) Is there a way I can design the spring to fold easier upon the surface? 3) Are there any coatings or platings I can apply to the contact surfaces of the leaf spring that will allow an equally capable electrical power transmission between the two or give a surface finish that will eliminate scratching? I'm under the impression that the Rockwell B Hardness of the CuBe leaf spring is 45-78 while the gold is so soft it can't be measured on the same scale. The only data I can find on the 59 gold is that it has a Vicker's hardness of 25-170, which is a huge range.... I do believe a Vicker's hardness of 150+ from the conversion chart I found here shows that the gold will be about as hard or harder than the copper-beryllium, which eliminates the worry altogether since a "harder" material cannot be scratched by the lesser one. Then again, that's just my knowledge from undergraduate materials classes so that could be a wrong assumption. Oh, and nice forum! My name is Graham and I work for a company called SemiNex which designs and manufactures high-power 1450 nm laser diodes. |
|||
|
04-21-2008, 02:03 PM
Post: #2
|
|||
|
|||
|
RE: Copper Contact to Gold Surface Design Question
Hi Graham
to the Surface Engineering Forum.Not sure what "59 gold" is but if it is relatively pure gold, then the hardness (~30 HV) will probably be much lower than the beryllium copper alloy. I would consider gold plating for the leaf springs primarily for good electrical contact and similar hardness. The leaf spring design I think should be optimised to give contact with minimum sliding motion between contact faces with the minimum force required to give the required electrical contact. Hope that helps. Regards Gordon |
|||
|
04-21-2008, 02:28 PM
Post: #3
|
|||
|
|||
|
RE: Copper Contact to Gold Surface Design Question
Some tips for people placing images in posts:
Try and size image to fit page so that we do not need to scroll back and forth to read the text. If big images are important, insert a hyperlink or better still link via a smaller thumb nail image. Big image files also tend to slow down page loading particularly those without fast broadband connections. See here for more help. Regards Gordon |
|||
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|

SEF Portal
Search Archives
Search
Member List
Calendar
Help

![[Image: fullviewud8.jpg]](http://img367.imageshack.us/img367/5332/fullviewud8.jpg)
![[Image: zoomiw4.jpg]](http://img444.imageshack.us/img444/9686/zoomiw4.jpg)
![[Image: coppercontactbladeprofiga2.jpg]](http://img237.imageshack.us/img237/5076/coppercontactbladeprofiga2.jpg)



to the Surface Engineering Forum.