|
Copper Coating of API threads 13Cr110
|
|
06-20-2008, 04:41 PM
Post: #1
|
|||
|
|||
|
I am looking for a concise and plausable argument of copper coating API threads (13Cr110) versus just bead blasting. Thanks...
|
|||
|
06-20-2008, 06:22 PM
Post: #2
|
|||
|
|||
|
RE: Copper Coating of API threads 13Cr110
Hi Mike
to the Surface Engineering Forum.Copper coating on one connection surface of an API thread (creating dissimilar surfaces) is used to reduce galling and seizer. Regards Gordon |
|||
|
06-20-2008, 06:39 PM
Post: #3
|
|||
|
|||
|
RE: Copper Coating of API threads 13Cr110
Agree, but can the makeup still be accomplished with just bead blasting. I am into a "beer bet" and we need to make a decison.
I say always copper coat 13Cr. Thanks again and I enjoy the webpage. |
|||
|
06-22-2008, 04:19 AM
Post: #4
|
|||
|
|||
|
RE: Copper Coating of API threads 13Cr110
my guess: (just a guess) glass bead blasting can only increase the surface hardness, and reduce surface stresses. Copper coating is actually and new material in the thread, and the interface (mating surface) will now be copper coating against copper coating. Which on the surface is like to be some oxide facing another oxide. interested in your argument?
|
|||
|
06-23-2008, 03:37 PM
Post: #5
|
|||
|
|||
|
RE: Copper Coating of API threads 13Cr110
Hi Mike and Stephen
My bet would be for copper coating ![]() if we are talking a straight choice between the two systems without complicating factors like corrosion, lubricants etc. I would only consider this though, if only one of the mating surfaces were coated (or bead blasted if we look at the other arguement). A bit like running a steel journal within a bronze bearing. Copper on steel will have much less tendency for forming mutual adhesion together than steel on steel. Copper will also act as a more accomodating soft bearing surface.
Regards Gordon |
|||
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
| Possibly Related Threads... | |||||
| Thread: | Author | Replies: | Views: | Last Post | |
| Copper based alloy as a bonding layer in Flame / arc spray. | iwan-sedaryawan | 5 | 142 |
08-27-2008 03:59 AM Last Post: iwan-sedaryawan |
|
| Copper protection against high temperature corrosion | hgjor | 1 | 264 |
05-10-2008 02:07 PM Last Post: Gordon |
|
| Copper Contact to Gold Surface Design Question | gpalermo | 2 | 406 |
04-21-2008 03:28 PM Last Post: Gordon |
|
| Thermal spraying copper parts | DVB | 6 | 1,956 |
03-19-2008 04:50 PM Last Post: Gordon |
|
| Interface separation in Copper Nickel Indium coating | Donald | 7 | 767 |
01-14-2008 07:10 AM Last Post: William |
|

SEF Portal
Search Archives
Search
Member List
Calendar
Help




to the Surface Engineering Forum.

if we are talking a straight choice between the two systems without complicating factors like corrosion, lubricants etc. I would only consider this though, if only one of the mating surfaces were coated (or bead blasted if we look at the other arguement). A bit like running a steel journal within a bronze bearing. Copper on steel will have much less tendency for forming mutual adhesion together than steel on steel. Copper will also act as a more accomodating soft bearing surface.