|
O2/fuel ratio changes
|
|
03-11-2009, 05:30 PM
Post: #1
|
|||
|
|||
|
O2/fuel ratio changes
Need a lil help on changing the o2/fuel ratio and its impact.
If I go from a o2/fuel ratio of 3.37 down to 2.52 I am lowering flame temperature, lowering the combustion pressure and slowing down the particle velocity? Is that correct? When calculating the o2/fuel ratio, do you typically include the compressed air along with the o2? Thanks for any help
|
|||
|
03-11-2009, 06:57 PM
Post: #2
|
|||
|
|||
|
RE: O2/fuel ratio changes
Hi Intel55
What is the fuel and equipment? Regards Gordon www.gordonengland.co.uk www.surfaceengineer.co.uk Photography Obsession |
|||
|
03-11-2009, 07:48 PM
Post: #3
|
|||
|
|||
| RE: O2/fuel ratio changes | |||
|
03-12-2009, 02:36 PM
Post: #4
|
|||
|
|||
RE: O2/fuel ratio changes
(03-11-2009 07:48 PM)Intel55 Wrote:(03-11-2009 06:57 PM)Gordon Wrote: Hi Intel55 Ok I have a good idea about this, I use CH4 on CDS HVOF gun. stoichiometry at 1 for CH4 is 1 CH4 for 2 O2 In theory, higher temperature is for stoichiometry at 0.9, on CDS it is more near 1.1 or 1.2 probably because this gun have no combustion chamber. If you have less or more than this value, the temperature down. Generally it is better have more O2. Lower pressure you have slow particles are. I can't said more. |
|||
|
03-13-2009, 03:53 AM
Post: #5
|
|||
|
|||
RE: O2/fuel ratio changes
(03-12-2009 02:36 PM)landemarre Wrote:(03-11-2009 07:48 PM)Intel55 Wrote:(03-11-2009 06:57 PM)Gordon Wrote: Hi Intel55 Thanks for the info. I am still a lil confused. My Sulzer parameter for 5847 (86/10/4) calls for a o2/fuel ratio of 3.37. I am wondering if I go to a 3.0 or lower and keep the 40 gr/min and 250mm spray distance the same, what effect this will have on the coating. Will the increase of O2 increase flame temperature and particle velocity? |
|||
|
03-13-2009, 10:11 AM
Post: #6
|
|||
|
|||
RE: O2/fuel ratio changes
(03-13-2009 03:53 AM)Intel55 Wrote:(03-12-2009 02:36 PM)landemarre Wrote:(03-11-2009 07:48 PM)Intel55 Wrote:(03-11-2009 06:57 PM)Gordon Wrote: Hi Intel55 You will have flame temperature higher (for the same pressure) so higher temperature particles (or more oxydation) but have same particles velocity (or near the same). So coating should have less unmelt particles or more oxydation, probably more dense and perhaps more strength on it. |
|||
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
| Possibly Related Threads... | |||||
| Thread: | Author | Replies: | Views: | Last Post | |
| Stoichiometric fuel ratio =λ | Metallurgy_eng | 1 | 1,812 |
01-14-2011 08:44 PM Last Post: Gordon |
|
| The ratio of oxygen to fuel of Jet kote III | wangqun72 | 5 | 2,235 |
09-02-2010 06:18 PM Last Post: wangqun72 |
|
| Why Liquid fuel is better than Gas fuel in HVOF? | dibyendudhara | 2 | 3,447 |
05-06-2008 11:14 AM Last Post: dibyendudhara |
|
| Fuel for HVOF | Panf | 15 | 7,717 |
02-11-2008 04:54 PM Last Post: Stuart Milton |
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
Custom Search


SEF Portal
Search Archives
Search
Member List
Calendar
Help






