Surface Engineering Forum
Surface Engineering Forum Sponsor - Alphatek Hyperformance Coatings Ltd


  • Alternative Forum Home PageSEF Portal
  • Old S E Message Board ArchivesOld Message Board Archives
  • Search Old Surface Engineering Message Board ArchivesSearch Archives
  • Search
  • Member List
  • Calendar
  • Help

Current time: 05-22-2012, 12:30 PM Hello There, Guest! (Login — Register)


Surface Engineering Forum / Surface Engineering / Surface Engineering Threads v
« Previous 1 ... 9 10 11 12 13 ... 19 Next »
/ O2/fuel ratio changes



Post Reply 
Threaded Mode | Linear Mode
O2/fuel ratio changes
03-11-2009, 05:30 PM
Post: #1
Intel55 Offline
SuperMember
******
Posts: 153
Joined: Sep 2007
Reputation: 2
O2/fuel ratio changes
Need a lil help on changing the o2/fuel ratio and its impact.

If I go from a o2/fuel ratio of 3.37 down to 2.52 I am lowering flame temperature, lowering the combustion pressure and slowing down the particle velocity? Is that correct?

When calculating the o2/fuel ratio, do you typically include the compressed air along with the o2?

Thanks for any help Smile
Send this user an email Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
03-11-2009, 06:57 PM
Post: #2
Gordon Offline
Administrator
Posts: 1,671
Joined: Jun 2006
Reputation: 7
Facebook Twitter
RE: O2/fuel ratio changes
Hi Intel55

What is the fuel and equipment?

Regards Gordon

www.gordonengland.co.uk
www.surfaceengineer.co.uk
Photography Obsession
Send this user an email Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
03-11-2009, 07:48 PM
Post: #3
Intel55 Offline
SuperMember
******
Posts: 153
Joined: Sep 2007
Reputation: 2
RE: O2/fuel ratio changes
(03-11-2009 06:57 PM)Gordon Wrote:  Hi Intel55

What is the fuel and equipment?

DJ2700. CH4 (nat gas).
Send this user an email Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
03-12-2009, 02:36 PM
Post: #4
landemarre Offline
Active Member
****
Posts: 32
Joined: Jul 2008
Reputation: 2
RE: O2/fuel ratio changes
(03-11-2009 07:48 PM)Intel55 Wrote:  
(03-11-2009 06:57 PM)Gordon Wrote:  Hi Intel55

What is the fuel and equipment?

DJ2700. CH4 (nat gas).

Ok I have a good idea about this, I use CH4 on CDS HVOF gun.

stoichiometry at 1 for CH4 is 1 CH4 for 2 O2

In theory, higher temperature is for stoichiometry at 0.9, on CDS it is more near 1.1 or 1.2 probably because this gun have no combustion chamber. If you have less or more than this value, the temperature down. Generally it is better have more O2.

Lower pressure you have slow particles are.

I can't said more.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
03-13-2009, 03:53 AM
Post: #5
Intel55 Offline
SuperMember
******
Posts: 153
Joined: Sep 2007
Reputation: 2
RE: O2/fuel ratio changes
(03-12-2009 02:36 PM)landemarre Wrote:  
(03-11-2009 07:48 PM)Intel55 Wrote:  
(03-11-2009 06:57 PM)Gordon Wrote:  Hi Intel55

What is the fuel and equipment?

DJ2700. CH4 (nat gas).

Ok I have a good idea about this, I use CH4 on CDS HVOF gun.

stoichiometry at 1 for CH4 is 1 CH4 for 2 O2

In theory, higher temperature is for stoichiometry at 0.9, on CDS it is more near 1.1 or 1.2 probably because this gun have no combustion chamber. If you have less or more than this value, the temperature down. Generally it is better have more O2.

Lower pressure you have slow particles are.

I can't said more.

Thanks for the info. I am still a lil confused. My Sulzer parameter for 5847 (86/10/4) calls for a o2/fuel ratio of 3.37. I am wondering if I go to a 3.0 or lower and keep the 40 gr/min and 250mm spray distance the same, what effect this will have on the coating. Will the increase of O2 increase flame temperature and particle velocity?
Send this user an email Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
03-13-2009, 10:11 AM
Post: #6
landemarre Offline
Active Member
****
Posts: 32
Joined: Jul 2008
Reputation: 2
RE: O2/fuel ratio changes
(03-13-2009 03:53 AM)Intel55 Wrote:  
(03-12-2009 02:36 PM)landemarre Wrote:  
(03-11-2009 07:48 PM)Intel55 Wrote:  
(03-11-2009 06:57 PM)Gordon Wrote:  Hi Intel55

What is the fuel and equipment?

DJ2700. CH4 (nat gas).

Ok I have a good idea about this, I use CH4 on CDS HVOF gun.

stoichiometry at 1 for CH4 is 1 CH4 for 2 O2

In theory, higher temperature is for stoichiometry at 0.9, on CDS it is more near 1.1 or 1.2 probably because this gun have no combustion chamber. If you have less or more than this value, the temperature down. Generally it is better have more O2.

Lower pressure you have slow particles are.

I can't said more.

Thanks for the info. I am still a lil confused. My Sulzer parameter for 5847 (86/10/4) calls for a o2/fuel ratio of 3.37. I am wondering if I go to a 3.0 or lower and keep the 40 gr/min and 250mm spray distance the same, what effect this will have on the coating. Will the increase of O2 increase flame temperature and particle velocity?

You will have flame temperature higher (for the same pressure) so higher temperature particles (or more oxydation) but have same particles velocity (or near the same). So coating should have less unmelt particles or more oxydation, probably more dense and perhaps more strength on it.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
Post Reply 




Possibly Related Threads...
Thread: Author Replies: Views: Last Post
  Stoichiometric fuel ratio =λ Metallurgy_eng 1 1,812 01-14-2011 08:44 PM
Last Post: Gordon
  The ratio of oxygen to fuel of Jet kote III wangqun72 5 2,235 09-02-2010 06:18 PM
Last Post: wangqun72
  Why Liquid fuel is better than Gas fuel in HVOF? dibyendudhara 2 3,447 05-06-2008 11:14 AM
Last Post: dibyendudhara
  Fuel for HVOF Panf 15 7,717 02-11-2008 04:54 PM
Last Post: Stuart Milton

  • View a Printable Version
  • Send this Thread to a Friend
  • Subscribe to this thread


User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)



Google
Custom Search

Subscribe in a reader

Contact Us | Thermal Spray Coatings | Return to Top | Return to Content | Lite (Archive) Mode | RSS Syndication

Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2012 MyBB Group.


© Copyright Gordon England