Surface Engineering Forum
Surface Engineering Forum Sponsor - Alphatek Hyperformance Coatings Ltd


  • Alternative Forum Home PageSEF Portal
  • Old S E Message Board ArchivesOld Message Board Archives
  • Search Old Surface Engineering Message Board ArchivesSearch Archives
  • Search
  • Member List
  • Calendar
  • Help

Current time: 05-23-2012, 02:01 PM Hello There, Guest! (Login — Register)


Surface Engineering Forum / Surface Engineering / Surface Engineering Threads v
« Previous 1 ... 4 5 6 7 8 ... 19 Next »
/ Galling Testing



Post Reply 
Threaded Mode | Linear Mode
Galling Testing
06-16-2010, 08:51 PM
Post: #1
modey3 Offline
Junior Member
**
Posts: 2
Joined: Jun 2010
Reputation: 0
Galling Testing
Hello,

I have a question for the tribologists on the board. Is the pin-on-disk test appropriate for testing the galling resistance of different surface treatments? My feeling is no because when you are looking materials with different hardnesses like iron and aluminum, plastic yielding of the aluminum will become a problem. If the 0.5 dia ball is iron, the aluminum will be ploughed at even l lbs loads. If the 0.5 dia ball is aluminum, the aluminum will be sheared away onto the iron surface at even the lightest loads because the normal force and tangential force have a combined effect on the plastic yielding at the tip. Using that setup it would be very difficult to determine a galling threshold. Also, the contact area will change with loading/sliding distance.

I think a flat-on-flat test (such as the ASTM test) should be the most effective at determining the galling threshold, but I would like to hear the opinions of other on this board. Thanks

modey3
Send this user an email Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
06-17-2010, 02:11 AM
Post: #2
Simon Kim Offline
Active Member
****
Posts: 23
Joined: Feb 2010
Reputation: 0
RE: Galling Testing
First of all, I am not native speaker.

So please understand my broken english.

Pin on Disc test is useful for understanding of Galling properties.

At first you should to consider for edge effect and load carrying capacity.

Pin on disc makes contact area.

So you can predict for pressure of each materials after to compare each modulus of materials.

And then you can decide for the steps of contact stress for test, of course same pressure to materials.

That is first step for prediction of load carrying capacity.

However the result is not satisfactive sometimes, because of edge effect.

Sharp edge makes severe wear track on the disc, so researcher fall into confusion frequently.

He could not compare to exactly.

You have to prevent the edge effect by chamfer or roudness for edge of pin.

I wish your sucessful result!

Simon
Send this user an email Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
08-12-2010, 05:52 PM
Post: #3
HVoilF Offline
Active Member
****
Posts: 12
Joined: Mar 2008
Reputation: 0
RE: Galling Testing
The Falex Block on Ring test is much better in my opinion for tribological investigation , friction coefficient between pair of materials,wear test ,galling and material transfer consideration. We do use in Venezuela for galling investigation in the repair of big screw pump with Stellite 6 (screws)and carbon steel or stainless steel(casing) mating materials.
Please find information in http://www.falex.com
Regards

(06-16-2010 08:51 PM)modey3 Wrote:  Hello,

I have a question for the tribologists on the board. Is the pin-on-disk test appropriate for testing the galling resistance of different surface treatments? My feeling is no because when you are looking materials with different hardnesses like iron and aluminum, plastic yielding of the aluminum will become a problem. If the 0.5 dia ball is iron, the aluminum will be ploughed at even l lbs loads. If the 0.5 dia ball is aluminum, the aluminum will be sheared away onto the iron surface at even the lightest loads because the normal force and tangential force have a combined effect on the plastic yielding at the tip. Using that setup it would be very difficult to determine a galling threshold. Also, the contact area will change with loading/sliding distance.

I think a flat-on-flat test (such as the ASTM test) should be the most effective at determining the galling threshold, but I would like to hear the opinions of other on this board. Thanks

modey3
Send this user an email Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
Post Reply 




Possibly Related Threads...
Thread: Author Replies: Views: Last Post
  Vicker's Hardness testing complete method for copper(thickness 0.07mm to 0.28mm) Boopesh 1 1,500 02-24-2011 07:01 PM
Last Post: Gordon
  Peel of coating during pressure testing raviswanadha 6 1,622 01-14-2011 08:49 PM
Last Post: Gordon
  Friction and Wear Testing OptiEng 1 1,105 11-21-2009 04:26 PM
Last Post: Gordon
  Hardness Testing Stephen Booth 2 1,723 08-08-2009 05:16 PM
Last Post: Gordon
  Hardness Testing Methods and Conversion Gordon 3 6,310 04-01-2009 08:08 PM
Last Post: Gordon
  Testing equipment after surface engineering processes ir_minja 2 2,246 11-25-2008 03:41 AM
Last Post: ir_minja
  testing of abradable coating wasif 4 3,883 03-19-2008 03:51 PM
Last Post: Gordon
  Bentonite Abradable-Erosion Testing gejohn 1 3,437 02-19-2008 02:48 AM
Last Post: Gordon
  THICKNESS TESTING OF 316 L COATING vijaydeshin 1 3,305 02-02-2007 04:14 PM
Last Post: Gordon
  ULTRASONIC TESTING OF THERMAL SPRAYED COATINGS vijaydeshin 4 4,975 01-04-2007 08:37 AM
Last Post: Alexangel1226

  • View a Printable Version
  • Send this Thread to a Friend
  • Subscribe to this thread


User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)



Google
Custom Search

Subscribe in a reader

Contact Us | Thermal Spray Coatings | Return to Top | Return to Content | Lite (Archive) Mode | RSS Syndication

Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2012 MyBB Group.


© Copyright Gordon England