Surface Engineering Forum

  • Alternative Forum Home PageSEF Portal
  • Old S E Message Board ArchivesOld Message Board Archives
  • Search
  • Member List
  • Calendar
  • Help

Current time: 12-16-2019, 02:40 AM Hello There, Guest! (Login — Register)


Surface Engineering Forum / Surface Engineering / Surface Engineering Threads v
1 2 3 4 5 ... 33 Next »
/ 8YSZ via F4-MBX porosity issue




Post Reply 
Threaded Mode | Linear Mode
8YSZ via F4-MBX porosity issue
11-13-2019, 03:31 PM
Post: #1
firegod Offline
Newbie
*
Posts: 1
Joined: Oct 2018
Reputation: 0
8YSZ via F4-MBX porosity issue
Dear Colleagues,

Need an advice on 8YSZ deposition using F4-MBX plasma torch. My spec requires roughness of 12-16%, I tried to acquire it using the following parameters:
Argon 38 nlpm
Hydro 9.5 nlpm
Current 550 amp
Carrier 5.0 nlpm
Feed rate 70 gpm (Metco 233C -125+45)
Torch travel speed 400-500 mmps
Double injector feed from 2 separate powder feeders

Examples of reference/acceptable structure are on pictures 1 and 2.

I tried to replicate it with the parameters stated above with 2 alterations subject to my system's layout:
1) instead of 2 feeders I used one with T-connector
2) reduced carrier gas from 5 to 4 nlpm to merge the standard double spraying spot into one long vertical spot (to optimise the programming)

As a result I got structure shown on Picture 3. Comparing to the first two ref pictures it contains a lot of disperse porous phase (marked on the pic) which increases the coating porosity significantly (up to 24-26%) although most of parameters are the same.

Next I reduced the feed to 60 gpm and increased Hydrogen supply to 11 nlpm. It helped me to reduce the undesired phase quantity but overall porosity didn't go below 20% (see pic 4).

My questions are:
1) What is the marked phase in the coating? Is it 233C unmelts or can it be just dust getting caught onto substrate in between passes? I so far evaded using air nozzles on the gun, so to say, to reduce part programming efforts.
2) Can different porosity results acquired on same spraying parameters be caused by different hose/cable lengths on my system and reference systems?
3) Was it a good or bad idea to merge 2 injectors stream by reducing carrier gas?
4) Which way must i go with the parameters to further optimise the structure and acquire the desired 12-16%?

Images:
#1: https://imgshare.io/image/UZWj6
#2: https://imgshare.io/image/UZjKc
#3: https://imgshare.io/image/UZ8Fe
#4: https://imgshare.io/image/UZPay

Thanks!
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
11-22-2019, 09:03 PM
Post: #2
Spraypowderengineer Offline
Newbie
*
Posts: 1
Joined: Oct 2019
Reputation: 0
RE: 8YSZ via F4-MBX porosity issue
I would not use a T tube. You never know how much powder goes either way. Better to use two injectors with two feeders.

Feed gas per injector controls how deep you inject. Deeper is more melting, so better DE but lower porosity.

Use 8 mm nozzle, not 6mm (in case you do).

If you do not find a process window, vary electric current and start from new.

This powder has a weakness, it has low mechanical stability, generates fines and creates pulsation of real feed rate. Such short time overload of the plume can be one of the serveral reaons for the high ununiformity of the degree of melting in your coatings. Try another powder, if the problem persists.

Hope this helps you
Send this user an email Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
Post Reply 




Possibly Related Threads...
Thread: Author Replies: Views: Last Post
  Chrome-Carbide coating issue DanyGans 11 4,684 10-08-2019
05:19 PM
Last Post: Lemster68
  IRC5 ABB robot issue demionkrishan 0 214 09-19-2019
04:21 PM
Last Post: demionkrishan
  95 MXC Porosity vcduramais 8 678 09-09-2019
05:46 PM
Last Post: velocity
  16C-NS cracking issue kyuntak 10 637 06-26-2019
01:29 PM
Last Post: Gordon
  Arc spray porosity problem velocity 6 789 06-01-2019
01:19 PM
Last Post: velocity
  Determination of Porosity demionkrishan 1 524 03-31-2019
02:37 PM
Last Post: Vadim Verlotski
  High porosity in WcCoCr demionkrishan 4 1,007 02-24-2019
06:16 PM
Last Post: loriolo
  Porosity in D gun coating DavidH 1 1,246 06-26-2017
08:48 PM
Last Post: Vadim Verlotski
  Request for solution to reduce porosity in HVOF Tungsten Carbide Coatings sreenuvundela 6 7,385 05-23-2017
06:46 PM
Last Post: loriolo
  HVOF porosity sprayloud 4 3,161 11-28-2016
02:27 PM
Last Post: MVagusta
Question ISSUE using SG100 plasma torch w/ 9MP feeder HBX 5 2,929 05-04-2016
09:11 AM
Last Post: loriolo
  How to determine the porosity level of Metco 320NS abradable coating? viewwer 6 4,586 11-23-2015
09:57 AM
Last Post: Joris Kraak
  Heat treatment after HVOF process to decrease porosity Giroud 3 3,588 07-13-2015
05:51 AM
Last Post: aerotherm
  HVOF DJ2600 DJ8W powder feeder issue vetrinit 5 4,346 06-17-2015
04:39 PM
Last Post: loriolo
  yttria stabilized zirconia (TBC) Porosity issue cris1904 5 3,772 04-24-2015
12:56 PM
Last Post: Joris Kraak

  • View a Printable Version
  • Send this Thread to a Friend
  • Subscribe to this thread


User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)





Surface Engineering Forum Sponsor - Alphatek Hyperformance Coatings Ltd

    Subscribe in a reader

    Contact Us | Thermal Spray Coatings | Return to Top | Return to Content | Lite (Archive) Mode | RSS Syndication

Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2019 MyBB Group.


© Copyright Gordon England